Followers

Thursday, June 21, 2012

OMG, What is She Wearing??



‘“Materialism” suggests that you define yourself in the terms of your material possessions and your physical appearance, placing more importance on material wealth than other aspects of life” (Thorpe 2007). Do you remember in middle school when the cool thing to do was wear clothes that were ONLY purchased from Abercrombie, Hollister, and even American Eagle? Ah, those were the days…going to the mall and begging my mom to buy me the dinky, little, baby tee from Hollister for $30. Most mothers give their children money for back to school clothes, say $100 to $150, and you can spend it on whatever you wanted, but once that money was gone, it was gone. Naturally, most of would use the money to buy a few shirts from Abercrombie, as in 3 shirts or so, and then boom- moneys gone. So why did we make foolish decisions like this when we were younger? Because it is our culture in America to fit into the society we engage in. I chose to wear those shirts and booty shorts because all of my friends I hung out with begged their mom’s to buy the same clothes too.
When taking an inside look at understanding sustainability, the design aspect within our culture plays a huge role. Take for instance the commercial culture; when designers advertise and market the next, latest and greatest product coming out, other designers are pressured to hone in on these economic interests and create a similar and even better option for consumers. With how fast our industry has sped along over the past fifty years, products have continuously been reshaped, reproduced, and even totally recreated just to keep up with the fast pace of our culture. “Historically, people relied on internal methods, such as prayer, cultivation of skills (music, painting, or writing) or personal relationships, to meet need” (Thorpe 2007). Now a days people are relying on external methods such as owning several material goods and constantly keeping up with the media. Designers have become what are now known as “pushers”. They are given this title because they aid businesses in pushing more artifacts through the market, therefore continuing into the pile of a consumer’s possessions. Therefore, designers have a HUGE impact on what our society consumes. If designers are ones who start the trends and continue what our culture is about, why not put forth the notion of designing sustainable?
Our economy is broken up into three main sectors, private, public, and nonprofit. Private; meaning self individuals and companies whose goal is to create a profit for themselves through the market. Public demonstrates governments with a financial goal of collecting the public’s resources to provide services such as education, legal systems, etc. And nonprofit, which is neither a business nor related to the government. Their main focus is working to meet the social needs of this world.
As I was researching I came across a man named Peter York. He is the senior vice president and director of research for the TCC Group. York came up with a simple, yet applicable formula for sustainability. 

This formula is made up with 3 main goals in mind in order to earn sustainability. The TCC company digs deeper within each section to acknowledge what each goal entitles. The first one, leadership, shows that you are to have a clarity and vision of what your mission is. With that, you also need to have others motivated towards that same mission. You also need to be decisive when it comes to making challenging decisions along with accountability involving the most cost-effective plan. The most important component that comes with leadership is being able to have a strategic plan throughout the entire process. When it comes to adaptability, this is where all of the finances come into play. In order to adapt to sustainability, you must have community leaders, institutional grant makers, and board leaders be “all in” and ready to invest in sustainability. They need to be people that you can form long term relationships with, that will support you through the entire process of moving towards sustainability. Then as far as program capacity goes, you must have adequate facilities and program staff with the knowledge of sustainability in order to keep the process running and improving even more towards a more sustainable world. 


I happened to come across a group called Project H Design. This group is a non-profit organization that deals with several interior design issues. Their main mission in mind is to design, build, teach, and transform. Their team is made up of designers, builders, and teachers who all have the same goal: to build a creative environment to transform a unique way of teaching. Even though their focus isn't creating a sustainable building, they still have the right idea of getting noticed. By making themselves non-profit and building incredible atmospheres for children all over the United States makes me wonder, why not do the same thing, but with sustainability? The same results should be expected, but even greater once people realize how appropriate these buildings should be created in the first place. So, why not? I copied the link to their website just below. 


http://www.projecthdesign.org/#studio-h


Check out this project! It’s run by a group called Second Nature. They are a national non-profit organization that is located out of Boston. Their focus is to create a healthy, just, and sustainable society by transforming higher education. This group has moved by leaps and bounds to where they are today. So maybe they’re right? Working to create a better future by educating the students now about where our environment and economy is heading, and what direction would be a much more sustainable and improved environment. Could pressing this constant idea into their brains truly work to change our nation’s future? Possibly. Whether it does or doesn’t, it’s making some kind of impact on the students whether they realize it or not. And that my friends, is a step in the right direction.

12 comments:

  1. Hi, Hannah;
    You have provided some interesting examples of conceptual movements that are happening that embody some of the sustainable approaches you read about. I think this could be enhanced with some examples from your field.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hannah,
    I really appreciated your Second Nature video because I think that it has provided us with a great program. If students were more informed i school from the beginning, they would think of sustainability choices as "second nature." What I think is so cool about this, is that when it said the part about the students being 100% of our future, our generation and the generations behind us ahve the capability to make a change! I think the most important part of your blog about reaching sustainability is the adaptability stage in the TCC formula. Once our society can adapt to the changes that need to be made, living sustainably will be second nature to us. Designers or "pushers" shall I say have been under so much pressure by the large companies and corporations to design exactly what they want and what society's latest trend is, do you think it's possible for us to turn this around? In the Designer's Atlas it says "the more all consumers are alike, or can be groomed through advertising to be alike, the better it is for selling: They'll all want the same product" (Thorpe, 2007). These commercial pressures, are pushing us to think short-term but if we could start pressuring them into advertising for sustainability then as Thorpe says they will all want the same thing, and our goal is for that to be a sustainable product. So why do you think that companies are still pressuring for the short-term? Isn't selling all they are worried about, its money to them either way, sustainable or not. So why do you think that the media and advertising isn't pressuring consumers more into sustainable products? They obviously have a huge impact on the world! Good Job!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi, thanks for commenting on my blog! I really liked the video I posted too, very informative and true about the future. I think you're right when you say that we as designers are the pushers for the consumers who buy what we design. But you're also right about just selling what people want! Several people don't care what the products are made of, all they care about is making a generous profit! It all comes back to the whole trending theme for me. As soon as people know it's hot on the market, designers will produce more, and people will buy it no matter what the price. Wouldn't you agree?

      Delete
    2. I definitely agree! I think that there is a portion of people out there that are concerned and wouldn't give in to the trend but for the most part, we are composed of an uninformed society and of people who really just don't care. Materialism has become such a big issue in our world that everyone would like to fit in, and everyone likes to have the hot new thing that everyone else has! It's just a vicious circle!

      Delete
  3. Hannah,

    In middle school, I was the exact same way. I loved to shop at Hollister and American Eagle, but to tell you the truth I never thought the Hollister brand of clothes ever really fit that well. We as children, just wanted to fit in and have the most stylish clothes we could wear. But, why did we spend so much of that money on just three shirts? That seems so ridiculous to me now! As designers, how can we help keep our clients and consumers from making choices like these? Is there a way to make money without “mass producing?” Is making products more sustainable the only way or can we create a change simply through consumer awareness? Also, in what ways do you think as design students we can use the TCC formula for sustainability? I think using this formula is a really great way to improve societies views on sustainability! Therefore, how can we lead, adapt, and inform so that we can in part help with the movement towards sustainability. I would love to know more! Great Job Hannah!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Yeah I think you answered the last question on your own. It's pretty self explanatory, as I wrote above in my blog, to have a mission for gaining a more sustainable world, getting people on board with you who would be great influencers and carry on with the same process to keep sustainability progressing. There is also several ways not to "mass produce". One is making your item unique and one of a kind, you could also make it very pricey which would cause only a few wealthier people to purchase that item. Those are just a few ideas! Thanks for posting on my blog!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hannah,

      I think your ideas are very interesting about "mass production." I agree, that making more unique items would be a great way to have "one of a kind" items. However, sometimes this creates trends and more and more people purchase these items which would create a mass production, unless it was an item created by artists where there are only so many in the world. Also, would you really want to make these sustainable items more expensive? Wouldn't that create society to steer away from such items? Just a couple thoughts, but I enjoyed your discussion of my questions. Thanks, Hannah!

      Delete
  5. Hello Hannah!

    Once again I loved your post this week! I was just like you in the since of always begging my parents to let me have some of the hip clothes back in middle school! I have a younger sister and I remember watching her do the same thing too! Its funny how fitting in and popularity drives us and how it affects us as consumers. I too agree that the speed of our industries are way too fast and that it is a large contributing factor to the sustainability issues we are facing today. As Thorpe says "Everything in design is speeding up. In the 'old days', artifacts were made at the pace of the craftsperson. Large or complex projects could take decades, even centuries." We can make projects in about a tenth of this time now and I think that because of our increase in speed of production the increase of speed for the wants and needs of consumers are the result. This thought is just on the fence to me too though because you would think being able to create products faster is a good thing and that the growth in technology is nothing but wonderful. However has technology hurt us more than we know? It makes me wonder sometimes if this is the case and if our downfall would be because of technology. On another note I loved all of your research you incorporated! My favorite was learning about Second Nature, probably because it applies to me the most at this point in time. It is more than true that the graduating students are the ones that are about to make the biggest impact in leading our world to where it is going. So I love that this program is dedicated to helping the younger generations to learn how to make a better difference in the future. We are in this process due to this class and I can say it has helped change my mindset and will influence many decisions I will make as a designer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Kaitlin,

      I like the Second Nature group as well, I was glad I could share it with everyone. I think you're right when you mentioned how fast technology is moving. But could it be a good thing? Maybe for us as designers, yes. Having programs such as CAD and Revit save so much money on buying and using paper to draw out our designs. But in some ways I do believe it could hurt us too! With items updating so fast, such as cell phones, old phones are constantly trashed and filling up the landfill. I guess almost every system has its pros and cons!

      Delete